<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Loose Thread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.realtors.org/crt/2007/04/10/loose-thread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.realtors.org/crt/2007/04/10/loose-thread/</link>
	<description>CRT's communications</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martha Turner</title>
		<link>http://blog.realtors.org/crt/2007/04/10/loose-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-70184</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.realtors.org/crt/2007/04/10/loose-thread/#comment-70184</guid>
		<description>I'd rather have two emails, one acknowledging that you got their request and the other returned in a timely manner with the relevant information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather have two emails, one acknowledging that you got their request and the other returned in a timely manner with the relevant information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Castaneda</title>
		<link>http://blog.realtors.org/crt/2007/04/10/loose-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-25862</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Castaneda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.realtors.org/crt/2007/04/10/loose-thread/#comment-25862</guid>
		<description>Absolutely!  I like checking into this blog and reading what you guys have to say.  I find them very informative.

Agents have quite a debate on this topic that I blogged about over at ActiveRain.  Perhaps you could chime in?

http://activerain.com/blogsview/74525/Responding-to-Emails-Immediately</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely!  I like checking into this blog and reading what you guys have to say.  I find them very informative.</p>
<p>Agents have quite a debate on this topic that I blogged about over at ActiveRain.  Perhaps you could chime in?</p>
<p><a href="http://activerain.com/blogsview/74525/Responding-to-Emails-Immediately" rel="nofollow">http://activerain.com/blogsview/74525/Responding-to-Emails-Immediately</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris McKeever</title>
		<link>http://blog.realtors.org/crt/2007/04/10/loose-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-25859</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris McKeever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.realtors.org/crt/2007/04/10/loose-thread/#comment-25859</guid>
		<description>@Steve - good points, thanks for the comment.  I did not mean to imply 5 minute turn arounds - as I am on the fence with the whole 'always on' auto-responder.  It was more directed at those responses that need an (objectively) longer time to fulfill the initial request.  With that in mind, that is when I like to let the sender know that I got it, and am looking into it, they will definately hear from me in X, and if they dont call out the mod-squad to hunt me down!.  As opposed to keep someone hanging for a day+ and then provide them the response.

Again - thanks for the checking in</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve - good points, thanks for the comment.  I did not mean to imply 5 minute turn arounds - as I am on the fence with the whole &#8216;always on&#8217; auto-responder.  It was more directed at those responses that need an (objectively) longer time to fulfill the initial request.  With that in mind, that is when I like to let the sender know that I got it, and am looking into it, they will definately hear from me in X, and if they dont call out the mod-squad to hunt me down!.  As opposed to keep someone hanging for a day+ and then provide them the response.</p>
<p>Again - thanks for the checking in</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Castaneda</title>
		<link>http://blog.realtors.org/crt/2007/04/10/loose-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-25857</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Castaneda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.realtors.org/crt/2007/04/10/loose-thread/#comment-25857</guid>
		<description>Email to me is a tool that when used effectively can improve the level of service in your business via numerous mediums.  The only issue I have with responding to an email immediately is that it will through your focus off track if you are in a certain mode (like lead generation).

Emails, to me, are a great way to keep in touch with clients and I do respond to all emails daily.  I do not, however, email a quick response to a question for two reasons: I may be focusing on a dollar productive activity at that moment or I don't want to train my clients that I'm always available 100% of the time.  I need to space my time among many clients so they must understand that a 5 minutes response to their email is not always the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email to me is a tool that when used effectively can improve the level of service in your business via numerous mediums.  The only issue I have with responding to an email immediately is that it will through your focus off track if you are in a certain mode (like lead generation).</p>
<p>Emails, to me, are a great way to keep in touch with clients and I do respond to all emails daily.  I do not, however, email a quick response to a question for two reasons: I may be focusing on a dollar productive activity at that moment or I don&#8217;t want to train my clients that I&#8217;m always available 100% of the time.  I need to space my time among many clients so they must understand that a 5 minutes response to their email is not always the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
