<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICE - a cool idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.realtors.org/crt/2005/08/22/ice-a-cool-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.realtors.org/crt/2005/08/22/ice-a-cool-idea/</link>
	<description>CRT's communications</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith Garner</title>
		<link>http://blog.realtors.org/crt/2005/08/22/ice-a-cool-idea/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Garner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.realtors.org/crt/?p=18#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I've also read a good strategy, besides using ICE1, ICE2, etc, is to use the Home, Mobile, Work entries in your address book, if it supporst that.  So you have one ICE entry but with 3-4 relevant numbers via the address book.

I keep meaning to do this and keep forgetting.  Maybe I'll get on that tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also read a good strategy, besides using ICE1, ICE2, etc, is to use the Home, Mobile, Work entries in your address book, if it supporst that.  So you have one ICE entry but with 3-4 relevant numbers via the address book.</p>
<p>I keep meaning to do this and keep forgetting.  Maybe I&#8217;ll get on that tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
